Volume 12 -
mededj 2023, 12 - : 0-19 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zarei J, Babaei Heydarabadi A, Barg Bidvandi M, Fouladi Dehaghi B, Javadifar N, savari M, et al . Investigating the status of education in the field of students of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. mededj 2023; 12
URL: http://mededj.ir/article-1-478-en.html
URL: http://mededj.ir/article-1-478-en.html
Javad Zarei 
, Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi , Mohsen Barg Bidvandi , Behzad Fouladi Dehaghi , Nahid Javadifar , Mohammad Savari , Mohammad Hashemzadeh , Asaad Sharhani , Meymanat Akbari , Parisa Sheini-Jaberi , Nasser Hatamzadeh , SeyyedMohammadAli Noori , Mojtaba Kalantar , Nayeb Fadaei Dehcheshmeh *
, Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi , Mohsen Barg Bidvandi , Behzad Fouladi Dehaghi , Nahid Javadifar , Mohammad Savari , Mohammad Hashemzadeh , Asaad Sharhani , Meymanat Akbari , Parisa Sheini-Jaberi , Nasser Hatamzadeh , SeyyedMohammadAli Noori , Mojtaba Kalantar , Nayeb Fadaei Dehcheshmeh *
Shoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (2000 Views)
Introduction: In the medical field, internship, and field training play a very important role in the education of students. The purpose of the present study was to determine the status of education in the field for students and enhancing the level of health system accountability at Jundishapor University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz.
Methods: The current research was a descriptive-cross-sectional study that was conducted in 2019 at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz. The study people includes 209 senior students in all majors, 97 of faculty members, and 18 of non-faculty resident trainee instructors. The study tool was three researcher-made questionnaires, made available to the study subjects through the educational vice-chancellor of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz. Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Indices (CVI), and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used for content validity and internal consistency, respectively. The evaluation of training in the field was done in six domains. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS24 software.
Results: The number of participants in the study was 322 people. Examining the views of the participants showed that the state of education in the field was average for the six domains. In the comparison between different domains, 'content and compliance with the training curriculum in the field' had the highest score (2.38 out of 4), and 'motivational and behavioral issues for training in the field' had the lowest average (1.98 out of 4).
Conclusion: The present study's findings showed that from the point of view of the three target groups, the state of education in the field is still far from the ideal state. Therefore, it is recommended to plan to develop the necessary infrastructure for training in the field, provide motivational opportunities for faculty members, resident instructors, and other staff involved in student training, and improve the evaluation method.
Methods: The current research was a descriptive-cross-sectional study that was conducted in 2019 at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz. The study people includes 209 senior students in all majors, 97 of faculty members, and 18 of non-faculty resident trainee instructors. The study tool was three researcher-made questionnaires, made available to the study subjects through the educational vice-chancellor of Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz. Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Indices (CVI), and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used for content validity and internal consistency, respectively. The evaluation of training in the field was done in six domains. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS24 software.
Results: The number of participants in the study was 322 people. Examining the views of the participants showed that the state of education in the field was average for the six domains. In the comparison between different domains, 'content and compliance with the training curriculum in the field' had the highest score (2.38 out of 4), and 'motivational and behavioral issues for training in the field' had the lowest average (1.98 out of 4).
Conclusion: The present study's findings showed that from the point of view of the three target groups, the state of education in the field is still far from the ideal state. Therefore, it is recommended to plan to develop the necessary infrastructure for training in the field, provide motivational opportunities for faculty members, resident instructors, and other staff involved in student training, and improve the evaluation method.
Keywords: Field Training, Student, Medical Sciences Education, Accountability, Externship, Internship.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/01/6 | Accepted: 2023/08/6 | Published: 2023/08/6
Received: 2024/01/6 | Accepted: 2023/08/6 | Published: 2023/08/6
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)