The Impact of Report writing Training on the Quality of Auditory Reporting in Audiology Students and Graduates of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences in 1396-1398

Delfi, maryam; Amiri, Marzieh; Bayat, Arash; Tavakoli, Mojtaba; Taheri, Fatemeh; Shamil Shoshtari, Sahar

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

Reviewers Section

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Indexing

Ethics

In-press Articles

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 8, Issue 2 (9-2020)

mededj 2020, 8(2): 16-20

Back to browse issues page

The Impact of Report writing Training on the Quality of Auditory Reporting in Audiology Students and Graduates of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences in 1396-1398

Maryam Delfi ^*

, Sahar Shamil Shoshtari

Audiology Department, Rehabilitation School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences,Ahvaz,Iran.

Abstract: (3004 Views)

ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Report writing is a necessary framework for presentation of audio logical test results. One of the methods of teaching report writing is workshops. The overall purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of report writing on the quality of audiology reporting in Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences.
METHODS: This study is a quasi-experimental (before and after). 57 audiologists participated in the report writing workshop and completed pre- and post-test questions. A checklist was used to collect the data. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21 software. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data and Wilcoxon statistical test was used to compare the results before and after the intervention.
FINDINGS: The findings of this study showed following report writing training, the mean scores before and after the training showed a significant difference (P<0.001). And in all items improves the quality of reporting in audiology tests.
CONCLUSION: Based on this findings, report writing training improves the quality of reporting in audiologists, and given that there isn't formal training in this field, it is recommended to provide a workshop for all students in audiology.

Keywords: Education, Report writing, Auditory

Full-Text [PDF 673 kb] (810 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/09/20 | Accepted: 2020/09/20 | Published: 2020/09/20

References

1. DeLaune S, Ladner P. Fundamentals of nursing: Nelson Education 2010 ; pp : 83-95

2. Shendell-Falik N, Feinson M, Mohr BJ. Enhancing patient safety: improving the patient handoff process through appreciative inquiry. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2007;37(2):95-104

3. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, DesRoches C, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, et al. How Common Are Electronic Health Records In The United States? A Summary Of The Evidence: About one-fourth of US physician practices are now using an EHR, according to the results of high-quality surveys. Health Affairs. 2006;25(l1): 496-507

4. Lander P. Fundamental of Nursing: Standards & Practice.. Clifton Park, NY. 2011; pp: 165-201

5. Blair W, Smith B. Nursing documentation: frameworks and barriers. Contemporary nurse. 2012;41(2):160-8

6. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, Glaser J, Shetty KD, Jaggi T, et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006;13(3):261-6

7. Hemmati Maslakpak M, Khajeali N, Kazemi N. The impact of problem-oriented reporting education on characteristics of nursing report. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2013;26(85):26-34

8. Khodam H, Sanagou A, Jouybari L. Effectiveness of continual education on quality of nursing records. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2001;3(8):65-69

9. Müller‐Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Ann Lavin M, Van Achterberg T. Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2007;18(1):5-17

10. Monadi ZH, Hashemi M, Fakharzadeh L, Akbari NN, Khazni S. Assessment of Efficacy of oral feedback on trainee’s satisfaction In Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Education. 2018;1(27):29-36

11. Saedon H, Salleh S, Balakrishnan A, Imray CH, Saedon M. The role of feedback in improving the effectiveness of workplace based assessments: a systematic review. BMC medical education. 2012;12(1):25

12. Harkreader H, Hogan M. Fundamental of Nursing: Caring and Clinical Judgement2nd. Phildephia: Elsevier Saunders 2004; pp:60-99

13. Lillis C, LeMone P, LeBon M, Lynn P. Study guide for fundamentals of nursing: The art and science of nursing care: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2010; pp:100-120

14. Tapp RN. Ihibitors and facilitators to documentation: a nursing research issue. Int J Nurs stud. 1992; 29(4): 371-80

15. Nozarpour J, Shariati A, Moradi M, Salahshori A, Fasele M. Study the effect of training using problem-based reporting on the quality of nursing documentation in Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz 92 years. J Educ Ethics Nurs. 2014; 3 (2):72-80

16. Saranto K, Kinnunen UM. Evaluating nursing documentation - research designs and methods: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(3):464-76

17. Darmer MR, Ankersen L. The Effect of a VIPs. Implementayion programme on Nurse, s Knowledge and Attitvdes to wards Documentation. Scand Jcaring sci. 2004; 18: 325-332

Add your comments about this article

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Delfi M, Amiri M, Bayat A, Tavakoli M, Taheri F, Shamil Shoshtari S. The Impact of Report writing Training on the Quality of Auditory Reporting in Audiology Students and Graduates of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences in 1396-1398. mededj 2020; 8 (2) :16-20
URL: http://mededj.ir/article-1-338-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 8, Issue 2 (9-2020)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645