[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Reviewers Section::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing::
Ethics::
In-press Articles::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2017) ::
mededj 2017, 5(1): 7-13 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of educational group’s status based on types of evaluation methods of medical students at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014
Javad Kojury , Sara Rivaz * , Mitra Amini , Mojdeh Rivaz
Education Development Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (7344 Views)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evaluation is one of the major aspects in process of educational activities. Evaluation provides the possibility to assess strengthens and weaknesses. The present study has been conducted under the goal to assess approach of students evaluation by basic sciences and clinical sciences educational groups at medical school of Shiraz university of medical sciences.

METHODS: The present study is a cross sectional and descriptive-analytic. In order to assess medical school exams, a check list was designed and distribution to educational groups´ managers of basic and clinical sciences. After data were gathered, data analysis was performed.

FINDINGS: According to the result, 93.16% of clinical educational groups used multiple choices question (MCQ), 61.79% used Log-book, 3.57% OSCE, 50.83% DOPS, 45.57% Practical Exam,43.41% used Descriptive, 38.21% Oral Exam and 22.87% used Dobs. The basic groups the most average used 67.9% MCQ and 66.3% Descriptive Exam. While none of them no used Dobs and  Mini cex.

CONCLUSION: MCQs can only assess low leaves of cognitive knowledge, in which practical knowledge is critical using evaluation approaches such as descriptive exams, and Mini cex can approaches assess higher levels of cognitive knowledge along with emotional and psycho-motor aspects which can evaluation quality. Due to the fact that in most groups examined in this study MCQ was the most commonly used, results derived from the presents study were announced to educational groups in order to enhance their evaluation effectiveness by using different types of evaluations.

Keywords: Students ´Evaluation Methods, MCQ, Medicine School, Shiraz
Full-Text [PDF 555 kb]   (1971 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/03/15 | Accepted: 2017/03/15 | Published: 2017/03/15
References
1. Aronson L, Niihau’s B, Hill-Sakurai L, Lai C & O'Sullivan PS. A comparison of two methods of teaching reflective ability in Year 3 medical students. Medical Education 2012; 46(8):807-14
2. Darling Hammond L, Am rein Beardsley a, Haertel E, Rothstein J & Kappan PD. Evaluating Teacher Evaluation. Education Week 2012; 93(6): 8-15
3. Saiff AA. Educational module, comparison and Evaluation. 17th ed. Tehran: Doran; 2005; 8-10
4. Khademi Zare H, Fakhrzad MB. Integration of collaborative management and fuzzy systems for evaluating of students’ educational performance. J Res Plann High Educ. 2013; 69:23-40
5. Haghani N. Analysis of the learning progress tests based on electronic tests in Passwort Deutsch. J Res Foreign Lang. 2006; 33:37-48
6. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001; 357(9260): 945
7. Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39(3): 309–17
8. Farzianpour F. Evaluation in medical education, Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Medical Education, 2000; 2(57):72-78
9. Mesrabady J. Introduce and accreditation of concept map evaluation in learning progress and academic performance evaluation. J Educ Innov. 2011; 10 (38)7-24
10. Komeili G, Rezaei G. Study of student evaluation by basic sciences` instructors in Zahedan University of medical sciences in 2001. Iran J Med Edu. 2002; 2(8):36
11. Mirzaee A, .Kavery Zadeh F, Lohrabian V & Yeganeh Z. Evaluation of students & progress; University of Medical Sciences of Ilam. 2016; 8(2):92-97
12. Mousavi M, Maghami H. Comparison of new and old educational evaluation methods' efficacy on student's attitudes to innovation and academic achievement in elementary schools students. Inven Creat Hum J. 2012; 2(6):125- 46
13. Abbasi S, Einollahi N, Gharib M, Nabatchian F, Dashti N, Zarebavani M. Evaluation methods of theoretical and practical courses of paramedical faculty laboratory sciences undergraduate students at Tehran University Of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2009-2010. Payavard-e-Salamat. 2012; 6(5):342-53
14. Kouhpayezadeh J, Dargahi H, Soltani Arabshahi K. Clinical assessment methods in Medical Sciences Universities of Tehran: Clinical instructors’ viewpoint. J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci. 2011; 16(5):395-402
15. Delaram M & Forozandeh N. Student Evaluation by the faculty academic member of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2010; 7(1): 51-6
16. Meaiari A, Beiglar Khani M. Improving the quality of multiple-choice questions designed to Upgrade Assistant by giving feedback. Stride Dev Med Educ. 2012; 10(1):109-18
17. Atif Eid A. Types of achievement tests which are preferred by outstanding students at Al-Hussein Bin Talal University. J Educ Prac. 2012; 3(13):149-55
18. Shakurnia A, Khosravi Brojeni A, Mozafari A & Elhampour H. Survey on multiple choice questions of Academic members in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in 2005. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2009; 6(2): 129-38
19. Darling Hammond L, Amrein Beardsley A, Haertel E, Rothstein J & Kappan PD. Evaluating Teacher Evaluation. Education Week 2012; 93(6): 8-15
20. Sepasi H & Attari YA. The study of psychometric characteristics of Shahid Chamran University Faculty members final test scores. Journal of Education and Psychology Sciences 2006; 12(4): 1-20
21. Mavis BE, Cole BL, Hoppe RB. A survey of information source used for progress decision about medical Students. 2004. available at: http//:www.medded-ed-online.org/res.20012.htm
22. Amaechi CI, Ifeyinwa EO. The role of measurement and evaluation in national development. J Integr Know. 2014; 3(1):173-84
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kojury J, Rivaz S, Amini M, Rivaz M. Assessment of educational group’s status based on types of evaluation methods of medical students at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2014 . mededj 2017; 5 (1) :7-13
URL: http://mededj.ir/article-1-205-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2017) Back to browse issues page
مجله آموزش پزشکی Medical Education Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)