[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
Reviewers Section::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
In-press Articles::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 12 - ::
mededj 2023, 12 - : 0-0 Back to browse issues page
The Effects of Communication Skills Training on Dental Students’ Clinical Empathy
Soheila Derisavy Jorfian * , Nahid Ahmadian Yazdi , Amir Daneshpayeh
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract:   (1150 Views)
Background and Objective: Empathy between dentists and patients increases patient satisfaction and the effectiveness of dental treatments. With more empathy, dentists find more competence in taking history, performing clinical examinations and need assessment and treatment plans and giving instructions after treatment, and getting the cooperation of their patients. Research has shown that students' empathy decreases during their studies.
Methods: 60 students completed the Jefferson Clinical Empathy Questionnaire. Students were randomly assigned to two intervention and control groups of 30 people. The workshop was held for the group. After one month, the clinical empathy questionnaire was completed again by both groups. The questionnaire information of both groups before and after the workshop was entered into SPSS version 21 software and analyzed.
 Findings: There was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups regarding demographic and educational variables. Also, the average score of Jefferson's empathy in the two groups before the intervention was not statistically significant (P=0.76). However, after holding the training program for the case group, a statistically significant difference was found in the clinical empathy score of the case group and the control group (P=0.03). Also, the difference in the mean empathy score of the case group before and after the intervention was significant (P=0.05). Except for the ethnicity variable (P=0.03), none of the demographic variables had a significant relationship with the empathy score after the intervention.
Conclusion: By teaching communication skills, the level of clinical empathy of dental students can be improved.
Keywords: Training, Clinical Empathy, Dental Students, Effect
Full-Text [PDF 534 kb]   (576 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/08/22 | Accepted: 2023/08/6 | Published: 2023/08/6
1. Chen D, Lew R, Hershman W, Orlander J. A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. Journal of general internal medicine. 2007;22(10):1434-8.
2. Hojat M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. Philadelphia:Springer; 2007.
3. Sherman JJ, Cramer A. Measurement of changes in empathy during dental school. Journal of Dental Education. 2005;69(3):338-45.
4. Suchman AL, Roter D, Green M, Lipkin Jr M, Physician TCSGotAAo, Patient. Physician satisfaction with primary care office visits. Medical care. 1993:1083-92.
5. Colliver JA, Willis MS, Robbs RS, Cohen DS, Swartz MH. Assessment of empathy in a standardized-patient examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 1998;10(1):8-11.
6. Sarnat H, Arad P, Hanauer D, Shohami E. Communication strategies used during pediatric dental treatment: a pilot study. Pediatric dentistry. 2001;23(4):337-42.
7. Sondell K, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Dentist-patient communication and patient satisfaction in prosthetic dentistry. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2002;15(1).
8. Abrahamsson KH, Hakeberg M, Stenman J,O¨ hrn K. Dental beliefs: evaluation of the Swedish versionof the revised Dental Beliefs Survey in different patient groups and in a non-clinical student sample. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006; 114: 209–215.
9. Bernson JM, Hallberg LR, Elfstro¨m ML, Hakeberg M. ’Making dental care possible: a mutual affair’: a grounded theory relating to adult patients with dental fear and regular dental treatment. Eur J Oral Sci.2011; 119: 373–380.
10. Imanaka M, Nomura Y, Tamaki Y, Akimoto N, Ishikawa C, Takase H, et al. Validity and reliability of patient satisfaction questionnaires in a dental school in Japan. Eur J Dent Educ. 2007; 11: 29–37.
11. Armfield JM, Enkling N, Wolf CA, Ramseier CA. Dental fear and satisfaction with dental services in Switzerland.J Public Health Dent. 2014; 74: 57–63
12. Bakker DA, Fitch MI, Gray R. Patient- health care provider Communication during chemotherapy treatment patient. Educ&Couns. 2001;45:67-71
13. Newton BW, Savidge MA, Barber L. Differences in medical students’ empathy. Acad Med. 2000;75(12):1215.
14. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maxwell K. A brief instrument to measure patients’ overall satisfaction with primary care physicians. 2011; 43(6): 412–417. Fam Med. 2011;43(6):412-17.
15. Dulmen S, Brink-Muinen A. Patients 'preferences and experiences in handling emotions: a study on communication sequences in primary care medical visits. Patient Education and Counseling. 2004;55(1):149-52.199
16. Brunero S, Lamont S, Coates M. A review of empathy education in nursing. Nursing Inquiry 2010;17:65-74.
17. Levinson W, Roter D. Physicians’ psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10(7): 375-9
18. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med J. 2011;86(3):359-64
19. Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2013;63(606):e76-e84
20. Rakel D, Barrett B, Zhang Z, Theresa Hoeft T, Chewningd B, Marchanda L, et al. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Educ&Couns. 2011;85(3):390-7
21. Mercer SW, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland-A pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ&Couns. 2008;73(2):240-5.
22. Colleges AoAM. Learning objectives for medical student education: guidelines for medical schools: Association; 1998.
23. Carey J, Madill A, Manogue M. Communications skills in dental education: a systematic research review. European Journal of Dental Education. 2010;14(2):69-78.
24. Broder HL, Janal M. Promoting interpersonal skills and cultural sensitivity among dental students. Journal of Dental Education. 2006;70(4):409-16.
25. Ahmadian Yazdi N, Soltani Arabshahi K, Bigdeli S, Ghaffarifar S. Challenges in promoting clinical empathy skills in medical students: a content analysis study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Oct;33:104
26. Ahmadian Yazdi N, Bigdeli S, Soltani Arabshahi K, Ghaffarifar S. The influence of role-modeling on clinical empathy of medical interns: a qualitative study. J Adv Med Educ Prof.2019 Jan. 7(1):35-41.
27. 27. Hashemipor M, Karami MA. Checking the validity and reliablity of the persian version of the questionnaire of Jefferson scale of physicion empathy professionals.1391;19(2):201-211.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Derisavy Jorfian S, Ahmadian Yazdi N, Daneshpayeh A. The Effects of Communication Skills Training on Dental Students’ Clinical Empathy. mededj 2023; 12
URL: http://mededj.ir/article-1-460-en.html

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12 - Back to browse issues page
مجله آموزش پزشکی Medical Education Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)